The ideology of open science and the prospect of blockchain
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
The ideology of open science and the prospect of blockchain
Annotation
PII
S086904990002753-0-1
DOI
10.31857/S086904990002753-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Svetlana Chernozub 
Occupation: Leading researcher, Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control” of Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control”, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
87-97
Abstract

The ideology of open science is presented in the article as an instrument for overcoming the crisis that arose in science under the influence of the development of Internet technologies. It is shown how this ideology developed through attempts to form a concept of the Internet space of modern science in the technological and philosophical plans. The projects of overcoming the crisis in science with the help of blockchain-applications are considered. It is asserted that the monitoring of ideological trends is turning into an instrument of technological forecasting, that is, in the instrument of determining the field of the technical solutions in demand.

Keywords
blockchain, ideology, ideological trends, open science, technological forecasting
Received
28.12.2018
Date of publication
28.12.2018
Number of purchasers
1
Views
202
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
0 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues for 2018
2112 RUB / 30.0 SU
1

References

1. Berners-Lee T., Shadbolt N. (2009) Rozhdenie nauki ob Internete [The birth of Internet science] Den za dnem. Nauka. Kultura. Obrazovanie (http://www.den-za-dnem.ru/page.php?article=621/).

2. Blockchain for Open Science – the living document (2017) Blockchain for Science (https://www.blockchainforscience.com/).

3. Bradley J.-C. (2006) Open Notebook Science. [Published on Drexel COAS E-learning Blog, September 26] (http://drexel-coas-elearning.blogspot.com.br/2006/09/open-notebook-science.html).

4. Brock J. (2018) Mapping the blockchain for science landscape Hacker Noon (https://hackernoon.com/mapping-the-blockchain-for-science-landscape-546b61bfbd1).

5. Carafano J. J. (2012) Wiki at War: Conflict in a Socially Networked World. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

6. Chernozub S.P. (2018) Blokcheyn i socialnie seti novogo pokoleniya: utopiya, revolyuciya, socialniy vizov [Blockchain and Social Networks of the New Generation: Utopia, Revolution, Social Challenge]. Obshchestvennie nauki i sovremennost’, no. 1, pp. 134–142.

7. Destutt de Tracy A. (2013) Elementi Ideologii. Ch. 1. Ideologiya v sobstvennom smisle slova. Gl. 11. Razmishleniya o predshestvuyuschem i o sposobe Kondilyaka analizirovat misl [Elements of the Ideology. Part 1. Ideology in the proper sense of the word. Ch. 11. Reflections on the previous and on Condillac's navel to analyze the idea] Voprosi filosofii, no. 8, pp. 149–154.

8. Egerev S.V., Yushin V.P. (2007) Budushchee rossiyskoy nauki v rabotah perestroechnih avtorov vzglyad cherez 20 let [The future of Russian science in works of perestroika authors is a glance in 20 years]. Nauka. Innovacii. Obrazovanie: almanah NIO. Issue. 2 (http://riep.ru/upload/iblock/8e8/8e87987c743314f471d50f165f2a4007.pdf).

9. E-Research: Transformation in Scholarly Practice (2009) Routledge.

10. Fecher B., Friesike S. Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. RatSWD Working Paper Series, 2013.

11. Foley H. (2018) Many Scientific Studies Are Bogus, but Blockchain Can Help. Scientific American (https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/many-scientific-studies-are-bogus-but-blockchain-canhelp/).

12. Hannay T. (2007) Interview with Timo Hannay, Head of Web Publishing, Nature Publishing Group (http://jdupuis.blogspot.ru/2007/07/interview-with-timo-hannay-head-of-web.html

13. Huillet M. (2018) Oxford Profs Plan Launch of World's First Blockchain-Based, Decentralized University. Cointelegraph (https://cointelegraph.com/news/oxford-profs-plan-launch-of-world-s-first-blockchain-based-decentralized-university).

14. Jankowski N. W. (2007) Exploring e-Science: An Introduction. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, no. 12, pp. 549–562 (https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-pdf/12/2/549/22316922/jjcm com0549.pdf).

15. Kouzes R. T., Myers J. D., Wulf W. A. (1996) Collaboratories: Doing science on the Internet. IEEE Computer, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 40–46.

16. Matzat U. (2004) Academic communication and Internet discussion groups: Transfer of information or creation of social contacts? Social Networks, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 221–255.

17. Mirskaya E.Z. (2010) Novie informacionno-kommunikacionnie tehnologii v rossiyskoy akademicheskoy nauke: istoriya i rezultati [New ITs in Russian Academy science: history and results]. CyberLeninka (https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/novye-informatsionno-kommunikatsionnye-tehnologii-vrossiyskoy-akademicheskoy-nauke-istoriya-i-rezultaty-1).

18. Pool R. (1993) Beyond databases and e-mail. Science 261 (August), pp. 841–843

19. Science goes darknet? (2017) Blockchain for Science (https://www.blockchainforscience.com/2017/03/10/science-goes-darknet/).

20. Trujillo J. L., Fromhart S., Srinivas V. (2017) Evolution of blockchain technology. Insights from the GitHub platform Deloitte (https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/industry/financial-services/evolution-of-blockchain-github-platform.html#interactive2).

21. Wallerstein I. (2016) Centristskiy liberalizm kak ideologiya [Centrist Liberalism as an Ideology]. Colta.ru (https://www.colta.ru/articles/society/13382).

22. Wouters P. (1996). Cyberscience Kennis en Methode. Vol. 20, pp. 155–186.

23. Wyatt S., Scharnhorst A., Beaulieu A., Wouters P. (2013) Introduction to Virtual Knowledge Virtual Knowledge. Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England: MIT Press.