Fertility in Russia and Estonia: differences among russians in Russia and in Estonia and native estonians
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Fertility in Russia and Estonia: differences among russians in Russia and in Estonia and native estonians
Annotation
PII
S086904990000374-3-1
DOI
10.31857/S086904990000374-3
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena Churilova 
Affiliation: National Research University "Higher School of Economics"
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Sergei Zakharov
Affiliation: National Research University "Higher School of Economics"
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Allan Puur
Affiliation: Tallinn University
Address: Estonia, Tallinn
Leen Rahnu
Affiliation: Tallinn University
Address: Estonia, Tallinn
Luule Sakkeus
Affiliation: Tallinn University
Address: Estonia, Tallinn
Edition
Pages
89-114
Abstract

 

The collapse of the USSR, transition to market economy and structural changes in society had given start to the family and marriage transformation in Russia and post-soviet countries of Eastern Europe. Estonia is one of the examples of rapid deinstitutionalization of marriage, widespread of cohabitations and nonmarital births. At the same time, since first post-war decades Estonia accepted the Russian migrants throughout a long time. Research shows that adaptation of the Russian population in Estonia has proceeded slowly, and patterns of matrimonial behavior of the Russian migrants and their descendants in Estonia tend to be closer to base patterns of ethnical Russians observed in Russia. In this article the UN ECE ‘Generations and Gender’ Survey data were used to estimate and compare fertility behavior among the Russian and Estonian population in Estonia and Russians in Russia. Our results show the significant changes in reproductive behavior among Estonians and Russians in Estonia, but the probabilities of first births among Russians in Russia are stable across generations. The probabilities of second births were increasing from one generation to other among Estonians women, but contrary, decreased among Russians both in Estonia and Russia. The contribution of births in high-order unions to total number of births significantly increased both among Estonians and Russian population in Russia, as well as among Russian migrants in Estonia. At the same time, the reproductive behavior of Russians in Estonia has common features with behavior of the Russian population in Russia: the share of births in the unregistered unions is less, and length of the time interval between the first and second births in the continuous union is bigger, than for Estonians. However, there are signs of some changes in reproductive behavior among Russians in Estonia born after 1970.

Keywords
Russia, Estonia, Russian migrants, marriage, cohabitation, second unions, fertility, first births, second births, cohorts, UNECE Generation and Gender Project.
Received
05.08.2018
Date of publication
08.10.2018
Number of characters
2090
Number of purchasers
0
Views
81
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

1         

References

1. Artamonova A. V.,Mitrofanova E. S. (2016) Sozhitel'stva v Rossii: promezhutochnoe zveno ili legitimnyj institut // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. № 1. S. 126–146.

2. Demograficheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii, 1900–2000 (2006) M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo.

3. Zakharov S.V. (2007a) Novejshie tendentsii formirovaniya sem'i v Rossii // Mir Rossii. №4. S. 73–112.

4. Zakharov S.V. (2007b). Transformatsiya brachno-partnerskikh otnoshenij v Rossii: "zolotoj vek" traditsionnogo braka blizitsya k zakatu? // Roditeli i deti, muzhchiny i zhenschiny v sem'e i obschestve. M.: NISP. S. 75–126.

5. Zakharov S., Churilova E., Agadzhanyan V. (2016) Rozhdaemost' v povtornykh soyuzakh v Rossii: pozvolyaet li vstuplenie v novyj supruzheskij soyuz dostich' ideala dvukhdetnoj sem'i? // Demograficheskoe obozrenie. № 1. S. 35–51.

6. Furman D., Zadorozhnyuk Eh. (2004) Prityazhenie Baltii. Baltijskie russkie i baltijskie kul'tury // Mir Rossii. № 3. S. 98–130.